QA Environments: Why Do You Need So Many?
Nov 22, 2019
For organizations delivering high-quality software, a well-functioning QA environment is paramount. Test environment managers (TEMs) play a crucial role in ensuring efficient resource allocation and optimal testing conditions within software testing environments. One of the most frequent questions TEMs face is: "Why do we need so many QA environments?" This blog post delves into the benefits of utilizing a dedicated set of QA environments, exploring the various testing stages and the value they offer.
A Breakdown of Testing Environments
Before diving into the reasons for using multiple environments, let's establish a common ground by exploring the different types of testing environments typically encountered:
Development Environment: Primarily used by developers for unit testing their code before it progresses to the next stage. In essence, this environment often comprises the developers' machines themselves.
QA/Testing Environment: This environment serves as the testing ground for QA analysts and testers. Here, they perform a multitude of tests, including functional testing, non-functional testing (e.g., load testing, integration testing), and user acceptance testing (UAT).
Staging Environment: Essentially a replica of the production environment, the staging environment allows teams to verify the application's behavior under conditions that closely mirror production. This is crucial for identifying potential issues before deployment.
Understanding these different environments is a stepping stone to comprehending the advantages of employing multiple ones.
3 Compelling Reasons to Utilize Multiple QA Environments
1. Parallel Development Efforts and Streamlined Workflow:
In projects with frequent releases, development teams often complete a feature and hand it over to the QA team for validation. However, development teams typically have a continuous workflow, moving on to the next feature after completion. Here's where having multiple QA environments becomes advantageous. With two or more QA environments, features can be tested concurrently, preventing delays and bottlenecks in the development lifecycle.
2. Dedicated Environments for Long-Term Feature Development and Bug Fixes:
Projects involving the development of major features over extended periods (often months) necessitate a dedicated QA environment. These comprehensive QA efforts require database customizations unsuitable for production deployment. A dedicated environment safeguards ongoing development while enabling the identification and resolution of bugs encountered in the production system.
3. Efficient Testing for Systems Reliant on External Services:
Applications that interact with back-end services under independent development often necessitate multiple environments. These environments need to be configured to connect with the appropriate testing services specific to the development stage. Service-oriented architectures and microservices inherently require a greater number of environments to facilitate thorough integration testing and performance tests.
Determining the Ideal Number of QA Environments per Project
There's no magic formula for the ideal number of QA environments per project. TEMs carefully consider various factors to determine the optimal allocation:
Projects Interacting with Services Under Development: Applications that rely on services undergoing active development will likely necessitate more QA environments to connect with different service releases and versions. The complexity grows exponentially with multi-layered architectures where services depend on other services.
Critical, Customer-Facing Applications: Projects involving mission-critical customer-facing applications often require a faster turnaround time for bug fixes. These projects may benefit from additional staging or production environments to facilitate rapid response and maintain optimal user experience.
Cost-Effectiveness and Agility: A Delicate Balance
Some projects, particularly those involving continuous deployment and multi-stream development, might require a significant number of QA environments. TEMs play a crucial role in striking a balance between cost-effectiveness and agility. They meticulously assess the project's needs and calculate the optimal number of environments to ensure thorough testing without incurring excessive expenses.
The Rise of Hybrid Cloud Environments and Its Impact on QA Strategies
The IT landscape is constantly evolving, and hybrid cloud environments are emerging as a game-changer for many organizations. Hybrid cloud refers to a blend of on-premises cloud infrastructure and public cloud services, offering a "best of both worlds" approach. Public cloud services boast scalability, affordability, and ease of management, while private cloud environments provide enhanced security and control for specific needs.
The economic benefits of public cloud for scaling resources are undeniable. However, some industries with stringent regulations, like banking, might have limitations on public cloud usage. Hybrid cloud environments offer a solution by enabling organizations to leverage the public cloud for scalability while retaining the security and control of private cloud environments for specific requirements.
Managing Multiple QA Environments with Efficiency
Managing a multitude of QA environments, sometimes numbering in the thousands, can be a daunting task. This is where software delivery tools come into play. These tools can streamline the process of provisioning, configuring, and managing QA environments, allowing TEMs to focus on strategic initiatives.
The Intricacies of QA Environments: Why Multiple Environments Are Essential for Robust Testing
Download our free eBook
Mastering Software Delivery with Value Stream Management
Discover how to optimize your software delivery with our comprehensive eBook on Value Stream Management (VSM). Learn how top organizations streamline pipelines, enhance quality, and accelerate delivery.
